Print
13 April 2012| last updated at 11:14AM

Apple denies e-book pricing scheme



0 comments

SAN FRANCISCO: Apple on Thursday denied a charge that it schemed with publishers to hike prices for e-books, portraying itself as a hero for prying Amazon’s “monopolistic grip” from the market.

“The DOJ’s accusation of collusion against Apple is simple not true,” Apple  spokesman Tom Neumayr said in an emailed statement a day after a Department of  Justice antitrust suit was filed.

“The launch of the iBookstore in 2010 fostered innovation and competition,  breaking Amazon’s monopolistic grip on the publishing industry.”    The Justice Department sued Apple and five publishing firms Wednesday  alleging a conspiracy to raise prices and limit competition for e-books. It  immediately announced a partial settlement in the case.

Officials said three of the publishers agreed to end the scheme to force  retailers such as Amazon to accept a new pricing plan that ended their ability  to offer discounts for electronic books.

Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster reached a  settlement but the case will proceed against Apple and the other two —  Macmillan and Penguin Group — “for conspiring to end e-book retailers’ freedom  to compete on price,” the Justice Department said.

Attorney General Eric Holder said that as a result of the conspiracy, “consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles,”  and competition was eliminated.

Prior to the introduction of Apple’s iPad, online retail giant Amazon sold  electronic versions of many new best sellers for $9.99.

After Apple’s “agency” model was adopted, the prices rose to $12.99 and  higher, the suit said, and price competition among retailers was “unlawfully  eliminated.”    Sharis Pozen, head of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, said the  scheme was aimed at ending a discounting effort by Amazon.

She said executives in the conspiracy “knew full well what they were doing.

That is, taking steps to make sure the prices consumers paid for e-books were  higher.”    The move almost instantly raised the prices consumers paid for e-books, she  said.

“Just as we’ve allowed developers to set prices on the App Store,  publishers set prices on the iBookstore,” Neumayr said.

The suit filed in US District Court in New York said a conspiracy dating  back to 2009 involved “schemes to limit Amazon’s ability to discount e-books.”    Named in the suit with Apple were CBS Corp.’s Simon & Schuster; Hachette  Book Group, part of France’s Lagardere; the British-based Pearson’s Penguin  Group; Macmillan, a unit of Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck; and News Corp. unit HarperCollins.

Amazon on Wednesday hailed the settlement and said it would mean lower  prices for e-books for its Kindle reader.

“This is a big win for Kindle owners, and we look forward to being allowed  to lower prices on more Kindle books,” said Amazon spokesman Drew Herdener.

But Macmillan chief executive John Sargent said his firm would fight the  settlement because “the terms the DOJ demanded were too onerous” and would  allow Amazon “to recover the monopoly position it had been building before our  switch to the agency model.”    The lawsuit comes amid probes on both sides of the Atlantic over the  efforts to limit discounting on electronic books, which had been dominated by  Amazon until Apple launched its iPad in 2010.   - AFP

Leave Your Comment


Leave Your Comment:

New Straits Times reserves the right not to publish offensive or abusive comments and those of hate speech, harassment, commercial promos and invasion of privacy. Your IP will be logged and may be used to prevent further submission.The views expressed here are that of the members of the public and unless specifically stated are not those of NST.