Verdict on Bali bombmaker today

    0 comments

    JAKARTA: An Indonesia court is due to hand down its verdict Thursday against Umar Patek, dubbed “Demolition Man”, for his role in the 2002 Bali bombings, bringing a 10-year probe into the nation’s deadliest act of terror to a close.

    Patek, 45, is accused of assembling explosives for twin suicide bombings on  a bar and a nightclub in Bali that killed 202 people, including 88 Australians,  and church attacks in Jakarta on Christmas Eve in 2000 that killed 19.

    The West Jakarta district court opened the session at around 9:20 am (0220  GMT) with about 100 journalists, many Australian, crammed into a small  12-seater section to hear Patek’s fate four months after the trial began.

    Around 300 police were guarding the courtroom and four snipers stood atop  neighbouring buildings, West Jakarta police chief Widodo told AFP.

    The court is expected to deliver its verdict at about noon on charges  including premeditated murder, illegal firearms possession and bombmaking.

    Patek, dubbed “Demolition Man” by local media, cannot be charged for the  attacks under the country’s terrorism laws, which were implemented in 2003.

    Prosecutors are seeking a life sentence — sparing Patek the maximum  penalty of death by firing squad as he has shown remorse during the trial.

    The accused claimed he was “against it from the start” and had tried to  stop the attack at the 11th hour by suggesting waging jihad abroad. He has also  apologised to victims and their families.

    Before his arrest, Patek was the most-wanted terror suspect in Indonesia  and the United States had a $1 million bounty on his head.

    After more than eight years on the run, he was arrested in the Pakistani  town of Abbottabad in January 2011, where US commandos killed Al-Qaeda leader  Osama bin Laden four months later. He was extradited to Indonesia in August.

    Patek has testified that he played a minor role in assembling the  explosives, saying he mixed only 50 kilograms (110 pounds) of chemicals out of  a tonne, and denied having any bombmaking expertise.

    But US Federal Bureau of Investigation special agent Frank Pellegrino  testified in April that Patek was well known as an expert bombmaker among  militants in the region.

    Pellegrino said the FBI had collected evidence that Patek planned to kill  US troops and suggested he went to Abbottabad to meet bin Laden before his  arrest, a claim Patek has repeatedly denied.

    Patek is the last suspect detained in Indonesia to be tried for the attacks.

    “Indonesians and the international community have long waited for this case  to be over,” prosecutor Bambang Suharyadi said last month.

    The 2002 Bali bombings triggered a long crackdown on terrorism in  Indonesia, focused on weakening the Al-Qaeda-linked Jemaah Islamiyah (JI)  terror network blamed for the bombings.

    Anti-terror squads trained by Australian and US police have conducted  bloody raids, killing Dulmatin and Noordin Mohammed Top, suspected of helping  orchestrate the attacks, and Malaysian Azahari Husin, an alleged bombmaker.

    Indonesia also executed three men in 2008 — Imam Samudra, and brothers  Amrozi bin Nurhasyim and Ali Ghufron, known as Mukhlas — for playing major  roles on the ground in the operation.

    Several others have been jailed, including bombmaker Ali Imron, who was  given a life sentence for helping build and deliver bombs.

    The only suspect yet to be tried is Riduan Isamuddin, known as Hambali, who  allegedly helped orchestrate the attacks and has been detained at the US naval  base at Guantanamo Bay since 2006, accused of having financial links to  Al-Qaeda.  - AFP

    Leave Your Comment


    Leave Your Comment:

    New Straits Times reserves the right not to publish offensive or abusive comments and those of hate speech, harassment, commercial promos and invasion of privacy. Your IP will be logged and may be used to prevent further submission.The views expressed here are that of the members of the public and unless specifically stated are not those of NST.