- Muhyiddin: Arrest of 3 meant to safeguard peace
- BANTING MURDERS: N. Pathmanabhan, three farm hands gets death
- BANTING MURDERS: Judge praises police investigators
- Trio detained for making seditious remarks
- BANTING MURDERS: Full Judgement
- New passport improvement
- British soldier hacked to death by Muslim terrorist
- BANTING MURDERS: Guilty verdict brings closure for victims' families
- BANTING MURDERS: Chronology of events
- Highway bridge collapses in US; people in water
- Five dead as police helicopter crashes in Venezuela
- End near if self denial continues
- Siti Hanisah conquers world's highest peak
- Giant Lego Star Wars X-Wing lands on NY's Times Square
- Police confirm sex videos seizure of Pas leader More
ONE OF 14: Historical documents disprove claims that Sabah was cheated out of
OF all the paintings on the walls of my house, there is one that always steals my attention. It is the historic image of Sept 16, 1963 captured in a quaint black-and-white style. It is the one where the nation's fathers of independence -- Tun Fuad Stephens, Tun Datu Mustapha Harun and Tun Abdul Razak Hussein -- stood together on a podium in downtown Kota Kinabalu to usher in the birth of a new nation called Malaysia.
History was made that day when thousands of joyous Sabahans listened attentively as Tun Fuad Stephens (then known as Donald Stephens) held up a scroll and recited the Proclamation of Malaysia.
However, to infuse a dash of surrealism to the image, there is a coloured superimposed image of a boy in hip-hop clothing, pulling a breakdance move next to where the founding fathers stood.
If you look closely, you can see the weary eyes of the three Tuns fixed on the boy. Their facial expressions locked in disbelief and trepidation that one day, the future generation of Malaysians -- as represented by the boy's image -- will not understand the significance of our independence.
That imaginary boy in the painting could very well be any one of us today. Take for example the claim by certain people that Sabah is supposed to be one of four (not just one of the fourteen states) in the federation of Malaysia.
They claim Sabah had been cheated out of this position for the last 49 years. It is a very serious allegation, one which questions the very need of our nation's existence.
Let's find the truth by examining historical documents relevant to the formation of Malaysia. These include, among others, the 20-Points Document, the Malaysian Solidarity and Consultative Committee Report, the Cobbold Commission Report, the Inter-Governmental Committee Report, Hansard reports (on the Malaysia debate both in the Malayan and British Parliaments), the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and the Proclamation of Malaysia document.
Together with Tunku Abdul Rahman's and Lee Kuan Yew's autobiographies, these documents give us a better perspective of the circumstances which led to the formation of Malaysia in 1963. They narrate the state of affairs in Southeast Asia in the 50s and 60s, especially in terms of security and the uncertain future that our leaders had to deal with.
I provide some excerpts of the documents and agreements below. Judge for yourself if the argument that Sabah was meant to be one of four member states of the newly formed Malaysia Federation holds any water.
Article I of the agreement crystallised Sabah's status within Malaysia. It reads: "The Colonies of North Borneo and Sarawak and the State of Singapore shall be federated with the existing States of the Federation of Malaya as the States of Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore in accordance with the constitutional instruments annexed to this Agreement and the Federation shall thereafter be called "Malaysia".
Proclamation of Malaysia
The final paragraph reads: "... that Malaysia comprising the States of Pahang, Trengganu, Kedah, Johore, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Selangor, Perak, Perlis, Penang, Malacca, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak shall by the Grace of God, the Lord of the Universe, forever be an independent and sovereign democratic State founded upon liberty and justice".
The Inter-Governmental Committee Report
Partly set up to work out the constitutional arrangements of Malaysia, the committee remained steadfast on Sabah being one of the 14 states of the Federation via point 10 of Chapter II (Establishment of The Federation of Malaysia).
"The Federation will consist of the States of the existing Federation of Malaya, Sabah (at present known as North Borneo), Sarawak and Singapore... The name of the Federation shall be Malaysia."
Malaysia Act 1963
Section 4, Part II (The States of the Federation) states: "...that the Federation shall be known, in Malay and English, by the name Malaysia. The States of the Federation shall be -- (a) the states of Malaya, namely, Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Malacca, Negri Sembilan, Pahang, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Selangor and Trengganu; and (b) the Borneo States, namely, Sabah and Sarawak; and (c) the State of Singapore".
As an MP from Sabah, I would gladly and readily agree if Sabah was to be one out of four parts of Malaysia. Unfortunately, the documents above clearly stated otherwise.
They are part of history which were extensively argued and subsequently agreed upon, drafted and jointly signed by Sabah leaders of the time.
Part 2 will appear in the New Sunday Times tomorrow