THE sweeping generalisations made by Women, Family and Community Development Minister Datuk Seri Rohani Abdul Karim about the homeless being lazy and pampered (NST, 23 June) demonstrate the ministry’s lack of compassion and understanding for some of the most marginalised members of our society.
It is a grim sign of the state of our society when those responsible for the welfare of its citizens are content to blame volunteers and non-governmental organisations for the state of impoverished and homeless individuals.
I have been a volunteer with homeless outreach organisations for many years, and I uphold that these organisations and their volunteers are neither naive nor foolish, as the government implies. Homeless outreach organisations offer more than just food. Almost all offer basic counselling services, employment counselling and referrals, assistance to families and vulnerable individuals, legal advice and assistance, first-aid services and medical assistance, and opportunities for the homeless to find better jobs and re-enter mainstream society. For many of the most socially-excluded individuals, the practical help we extend is our way of telling them: “You have friends. We are here to support you, and help you when you are ready. We can talk, when your stomach is no longer hungry. Here is some food, and you don’t have to resort to unlawful or degrading means to obtain it.”
Most homeless individuals in the country are not unemployed, but are working at low-paying jobs. Some have mental illness or are of sub-average intelligence and, therefore, unemployable. Some have lost their jobs due to the deteriorating economy, personal problems, clinical depression or other medical issues. Some are victims of crime, sexual abuse or domestic violence. Some have been cheated of their wages by employers or had entered into business partnerships which failed. Some are senior citizens abandoned by their families and are unable to find a welfare home which will accept them. But, many are just ordinary citizens struggling to make ends meet and send money home to their families in other towns and villages.
The reason for the rising number of homeless people in the streets of Kuala Lumpur is the same as everywhere else in the world — urban migration for better economic opportunities, wage stagnation and rising costs of living. Rising rent, utility costs and fuel costs mean that low-income individuals who were previously able to rent rooms in the city are now no longer able to afford the same.
While affordable housing is available outside of city limits, the cost of private vehicle ownership and the lack of a reliable public transport mean that these individuals have no means of travelling to and from work. As a result, many opt to sleep in public areas not far from their workplaces.
I reiterate that none of them are pampered, lazy or entitled. All the homeless individuals we have encountered are proud to let us know when they have found rooms to rent, are leaving for better jobs or have saved up enough to return to their villages. They are invariably ready and willing to help one another and the organisations that assist them. NGOs and the food we give out are not the reason people sleep on the streets. Many politely decline food when they have eaten, and ask us to give the food to others in need. Many others care for stray animals which the volunteers then assist in neutering, vaccinating and feeding. Yet others save on rent so they can send money home to support their aged parents or schoolgoing siblings.
Homelessness isn’t a choice. No child dreams of becoming the person sleeping on the streets when they grow up. Somewhere along the way, something goes wrong. Our job is to find out what goes wrong and find solutions. We cannot punish people for just being poor.
The measures proposed by the government may face practical setbacks in their implementation. The government has provided drop-in centres and temporary shelters where the homeless and urban poor can obtain food and have a place to shower and rest. However, these shelters are often not operational or open to the homeless. Therefore, NGOs and volunteers are right to feel concern that the proposed government-run shelters and soup kitchens may not operate consistently or be accessible to all homeless individuals.
There is also the concern that the most vulnerable individuals — the abused, the mentally ill, the differently-abled and the victims of street violence — will not be able to come to the soup kitchens and shelters for the assistance they need.
If the government is sincere in its efforts to eliminate poverty and homelessness, it must first eradicate corruption and the stifling bureaucracy that make access to shelters and welfare homes an immense challenge. There must be legislation and real measures to implement a realistic livable minimum wage; protect the rights of workers; amend bankruptcy and foreclosure laws; and allocate a percentage of land and housing for the poor and disadvantaged and ensure that the latter are reserved for low-income citizens.
Long-term solutions can also be found in providing state-funded high quality education and skills training, microcredit loans for the deserving, mental health treatment and assistance for the
mentally-ill and substance-addicted, hostels and job training
for ex-convicts and former drug users, and legal assistance and
safe houses for women who are victims of domestic violence, trafficking or entrapment into the sex trade.
Investigations must be conducted into cases of unfair land acquisition, water and soil pollution and other forms of destruction of rural areas which threaten the economic survival of rural communities, causing rural folk to move to cities and end up as squatter citizens. Instead of waging war against the homeless, the law and society should wage war against poverty. The government cannot make it illegal for people to be homeless unless there are systems in place to make it virtually impossible to be homeless.
Wong Ee Lynn, Petaling Jaya, Selangor